2.jpg 3.jpg 1.jpg 5.jpg

Latest News

Update!

MLI (Marijuana Legalization Implementation Committee) had their meeting on Thursday, Oct 12th to review a revised draft of the committee bill ...please find attached below.
LR 2395 majority amendment, LR 2395 minority amendment and preliminary fiscal note...

2395 minority attachment link
2395 prelim fiscal attachment link
LR 2395 majority attachment link

Update!

MLI (Marijuana Legalization Implementation Committee) will be having another meeting on Thursday, Oct 12th@ 9:00am (TRA Committee Room, State House room 126) to review a revised draft of the committee bill (the majority report) and the minority report, which was voted on last Thursday (9/28) , once the draft is made public we will share.....

Legislative panel signs off on bill to spell out Maine’s rules for recreational pot

The committee that's drafting regulations for Maine's legal recreational market endorses the bill 13-2, but some lawmakers are concerned about Gov. LePage's opposition to legalization.
Live link http://www.centralmaine.com/2017/09/28/pot-taxes-scrutinized-by-lawmakers/

PLEASE BE THERE! This is so important!

PLEASE BE THERE!  This is so important!

Public Hearing - Tuesday, September 26, starting at 9:00 am

in the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee room (State House, Room 228).

The Bill Draft is available at http://legislature.maine.gov/legis/opla/comitinfoMLI.htm

A few points picked up on.... Dispensaries are able to convert to "for profit". 12 plants per parcel whether medical or otherwise. Meaning the the patients at my house are now not all allowed to grow at same time.
Also, going with both plant count and canopy for some tiers of growing.

You can send written testimonies to....
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Because the Committee anticipates a large turnout for the hearing, please be advised of the following:

(1) If you wish to testify, please sign up at table outside Room 228 the morning of the hearing. The order of testimony will follow the order of the sign-up sheets. Sign-up sheets will be available starting at 8:15 am on the 26th.

(2) If you plan on distributing copies of your testimony or other printed materials along with your testimony, please bring at least 25 copies of those materials for distribution.

(3) Testimony will be limited to 3 minutes per individual speaker.

(4) There will not be additional copies of the committee bill available at the public hearing.

(5) There will be two overflow rooms available if seating in Room 228 is full. Information on the overflow rooms will be provided at the hearing.

 

R Cullen Stuart Memorial Fund

One of Cullen's favorite events, MOFGA's Common Ground Fair, is this coming weekend. There will be a remembrance celebration in his honor at the Social/Political tent this Saturday, Sept. 23 @ 5:00. All are welcome! Friends are raising funds to plant a tree at the fairground in his memory. Any donations are greatly appreciated and will be used to plant a tree and further hemp production in Maine. Thank you!

VIEW THE PLUMFUND

Public Hearing - Tuesday, September 26, starting at 9:00 am

in the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee room (State House, Room 228).

The Bill Draft is available at http://legislature.maine.gov/legis/opla/comitinfoMLI.htm

A few points picked up on.... Dispensaries are able to convert to "for profit". 12 plants per parcel whether medical or otherwise. Meaning the the patients at my house are now not all allowed to grow at same time.
Also, going with both plant count and canopy for some tiers of growing.

You can send written testimonies to....
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Because the Committee anticipates a large turnout for the hearing, please be advised of the following:

(1) If you wish to testify, please sign up at table outside Room 228 the morning of the hearing. The order of testimony will follow the order of the sign-up sheets. Sign-up sheets will be available starting at 8:15 am on the 26th.

(2) If you plan on distributing copies of your testimony or other printed materials along with your testimony, please bring at least 25 copies of those materials for distribution.

(3) Testimony will be limited to 3 minutes per individual speaker.

(4) There will not be additional copies of the committee bill available at the public hearing.

(5) There will be two overflow rooms available if seating in Room 228 is full. Information on the overflow rooms will be provided at the hearing.

Kick-Off Event and Hiring Fair to be held August 29 at Augusta Armory

August 16, 2017
Labor
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: August 16, 2017
Media Contacts: Julie Rabinowitz, Maine Department of Labor, 207-621-5009
The Campaign’s goal is for 100+ employers to hire 100+ veterans during 100 days.

AUGUSTA— The 2017 Maine Hire-A-Vet Campaign kicks-off at 8:30 a.m. on August 29 at the Augusta Armory, 179 Western Avenue, in a statewide effort to commit at least 100 employers to hire at least 100 veterans and military family members during the 100-day period. Opening remarks from First Lady Ann LePage and Labor Commissioner John Butera will be followed by a hiring fair with more than 120 employers that are looking to recruit veterans, military family members and civilians. The event is open to the public.

“Through the Hire-A-Vet campaign, more employers are discovering the value veterans bring to their workforce,” said Governor Paul R. LePage. “Ann and I fully support this successful initiative, and look forward to helping make this year’s effort reach more employers and get more veterans good paying careers in our state. Whether you are a veteran or an employer, we urge you to connect with this campaign to help us meet Maine’s workforce needs. Veterans’ skills include teamwork, leadership, technology, and tremendous discipline that can benefit all of our businesses.”

The Maine Hire-A-Vet campaign provides support for employers to expand the hiring of veterans, to include a network of state and federal agencies, resources and nonprofits, education on military language and culture, recruiting and hiring assistance, and recognition for the hiring and advancement of veterans and military family members. Employers who want to join the 2017 Maine Hire-A-Vet Campaign can contact Steven Roy, Campaign Coordinator, at 207-624-5156 or This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. TTY users call Maine Relay 711.

At the end of the 2016 Maine Hire-A-Vet Campaign, 147 employers had participated and 197 veterans were hired with an average placement wage of $22.23 per hour. Follow the campaign on social media with #MHAV17 and on Facebook, @MaineHireAVet.

The Maine Hire-A-Vet Campaign is co-sponsored by Maine Department of Labor and its CareerCenters, Boots2Roots, Easter Seals and their Veterans Count program, Live + Work in Maine, Maine Bureau of Veterans Services, Transition Assistance Advisors, VA Vocational Rehabilitation & Employment, Veterans, Inc., and Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment.

Veterans, military family members and civilians seeking assistance in job search and training are encouraged to contact their closest Maine CareerCenter, which can be found online at www.mainecareercenter.gov/locations. Veterans Representatives and Career Counselors are available at each location. Employers that pledge to join the campaign are not required to hire veterans they interview in order to participate.

Maine Department of Labor and Maine CareerCenters are equal opportunity providers. Auxiliary aids and services are available to individuals with disabilities upon request.

**Exhibitors**

- AAA Northern New England

- Acadia National Park

- Adecco

- Aero Heating & Ventilating, Inc.

- Anderson Merchandisers

- AngleZ Behavioral Health Services

- athenahealth

- Backyard Farms

- Bath Iron Works

- Blane Casey Building Contractor, Inc.

- Bonney Staffing

- Boston Brands of Maine

- Break of Day Mental Health Group

- Capital Area Staffing Solutions, Inc.

- Care & Comfort

- Catholic Charities

- Central Maine Healthcare

- Cianbro

- City of Augusta

- Community Health & Counseling Services

- Community Partners Inc.

- Cumberland County Sheriff's Office

- Cunningham Security Systems

- Dead River Company

- DuraLife-Integrity Composites LLC

- EMHS

- ESM, Inc.

- Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc.

- Fisher Engineering

- Freedom Xpress Inc.

- Futureguard Building Products, Inc.

- Geiger

- General Dynamics - Saco

- Goodwill Industries

- Gorham Sand & Gravel

- Hamilton Marine

- Hancock Lumber

- Hannaford

- HMS Host

- Hodgdon Green Elderly Care

- Hutchins Trucking Co.

- IDEXX

- Irving Forest Products

- J.S. McCarthy Printers

- Johnny's Selected Seeds

- Journey's End Marina

- Kelly Services, Inc.

- Kennebec County Sheriff's Office

- Law Office of David Levesque, P.A.

- Ledgemere Transportation

- Life Share

- Lowe's Store - Brunswick

- Lucas Tree Experts

- Maine Bureau of Human Resources

- Maine Job Corps

- Maine Department of Administrative & Financial Services

- Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation & Forestry

- Maine Department of Corrections

- Maine Department of Environmental Protection

- Maine Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Child and Family

- Maine Department of Inland Fisheries & Wildlife

- Maine Department of Marine Resources

- Maine Department of Public Safety

- Maine Department of Transportation

- Maine Drilling and Blasting

- Maine Office of Information Technology

- Maine Office of Secretary of State

- Maine Revenue Services

- Maine State Police

- MaineGeneral Health/MaineHealth

- Manpower

- Mid-Coast Energy Systems

- Modern Woodmen of America

- Molnlycke

- Motivational Services

- NBM Railways

- Northeast Spray Insulation, Inc.

- Norway Savings Bank

- OceanView at Falmouth

- OnProcess Technology

- Opportunity Enterprises

- Pathways of Maine

- Paul G. White Interior Solutions

- Paychex

- PCG Health

- People Ready

- Poland Springs

- Port Resources

- Portland Police Department

- Pratt & Whitney

- Prudential

- Reed & Reed

- ReVision Energy

- Sam's Club - Scarborough

- Genesis Healthcare

- Seabreeze

- Seafax-OneSource

- Securitas

- Shaw's

- Social Security Office

- South Portland Police

- Spectrum

- Spurwink Services

- St. Mary's Health System

- Superior Carriers

- TD Bank

- Texas Instruments

- The Westin Portland Harborview

- Tire Warehouse

- T-Moblie

- Tradesmen International Marine North - Transworld Systems, Inc.

- Tyler Technologies

- U.S. Cellular

- Uplift. Inc.

- UPS

- U.S. Border Patrol

- VA Maine Healthcare System

- Viking Inc.

- Woodlands Senior Living

Mainers won’t be selling recreational pot by February deadline

The legislative wheels are turning, but too slowly to move marijuana out of the black market this winter.

Article by Penelope Overton, Portland Press Herald. Read the full article here: http://www.pressherald.com/2017/08/16/mainers-wont-be-selling-pot-by-deadline/

Maine won’t make its February deadline for beginning the sale of recreational marijuana and won’t be ready to do so until next summer, at the earliest, according to the committee tasked with implementing legalization.

A special legislative commission finished its preliminary work on how Mainers can grow, sell and buy recreational marijuana Tuesday, tackling issues ranging from licensing fees to tax rates to consumer protections. Now analysts will turn months of committee straw votes into the draft bill that will go to a public hearing next month and a full legislative vote in October.

But the agencies that will oversee the launch and daily operations of Maine’s recreational market will not have time to write departmental rules, hire new inspectors and staff, and license growers, retailers and testing labs before a legislative moratorium on adult sales ends in February, said Sen. Roger Katz of Augusta, a committee co-chairman.

“We want to get marijuana out of the black market and we want to do that as quickly as possible, but we need to do it right,” Katz said. “It is such a big subject and there was so much to consider. As it is, we’re remaining silent on some subjects, leaving others to consider them on other days, because we couldn’t possibly do it all.”

In January, the Legislature delayed implementation of all but the home grow sections of the Marijuana Legalization Act until February 2018 to give the state time to draft a regulatory framework for retail cultivation and sales that will be overseen by the Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry, and the Department of Administrative and Financial Services.

Advocates are critical of certain parts of the proposed bill, such as home grow restrictions, a requirement that most licensees have large cash deposits on hand that remain untouched, and the absence of provisions to allow for marijuana social clubs, but it is the delay in launching the recreational market that frustrates them most.

“The law as written and adopted by voters would have gotten the legal marketplace up and running as soon as possible,” said Paul McCarrier, president of Legalize Maine. “We could have a program ready to issue licenses now, but the committee thought it knew better than the voters. It has made one change after another, and each change pushes the timeline back ... and keeps the black market going.”

rsMcCarrier predicts that Maine will not issue its first adult-use licenses until summer 2018, more than a year and a half after voters approved it at referendum.

At past meetings, the marijuana committee agreed that Maine shouldn’t be the first state in the country to allow marijuana social clubs, limited the number of plants that could be grown for personal use on any one piece of property to 12 no matter how many people live there, and set the combined tax rate on recreational marijuana at 20 percent, with up to 5 percent of taxes collected to go to the host community.

In Maine, this tax scheme would drive the price of marijuana up from an average of about $200 an ounce to about $240, with a $20 excise tax levied on the cultivator, which would be built into the price, and a $20 sales tax charged to consumers at the time of sale. The host town would get $2 of that $40, with the rest going to the state.

On Tuesday, the committee tackled the last remaining topics of debate, some of which had left them divided at previous meetings, such as:

• Employers can refuse to hire job applicants or fire employees who use recreational marijuana, but landlords cannot reject or evict a tenant for recreational marijuana use.

• State regulatory agencies must hire law enforcement officers to enforce recreational marijuana laws, just like the state Department of Marine Resources uses patrol officers to enforce state conservation laws.

• State regulatory agencies can conduct annual or random inspections of recreational marijuana license holders, but it is not required.

• License holders can face revocation, suspension and fines of up to $100,000 for committing public safety violations, up to $50,000 for license violations and up to $10,000 for a license infraction, in addition to possible criminal penalties brought by law enforcement.

• Someone who is caught violating the home grow rules established by the bill could face up to a $1,000 fine, in addition to criminal penalties.

But the committee left other topics alone, deciding it didn’t have the time, expertise or jurisdiction to do things like deciding how recreational marijuana use is going to impact the job fitness of someone who is currently receiving unemployment benefits, or improving the state’s medical marijuana program or considering how to bring it under the same regulatory umbrella as recreational marijuana.

Committee analysts plan to have a draft bill written by the first week of September. They will meet with the committee chairmen, Katz and Rep. Teresa Pierce of Falmouth, to reconcile their summary of the committee’s various straw polls. A cleaned-up version of the draft bill will go to a Sept. 26 public hearing. The committee will discuss public testimony over the next two days before holding a final vote.

Once the measure is vetted, Katz, a Republican, and Pierce, a Democrat, will ask the state Legislature to convene a special session in October to consider the bill. The committee will have to sell the merits of the proposal to fellow lawmakers, many of whom have been on summer break while the committee did the bulk of its work, Katz said. Many lawmakers remain opposed to legalization, even after the referendum.

“We have an education job ahead of us,” Katz said. “A lot of people are not happy the law passed. To those people, I would say there are only two groups that want to see a regulated market set up – people who like marijuana and people who don’t like marijuana. Because really, we all have an interest in making the product safe, keeping it out of the hands of children, taxing it appropriately and keeping sales out of the black market.”

If approved, the agriculture and administrative and financial services departments will hire consultants to help write the rules needed to launch and run the new tightly regulated market, and guide them through the licensing process. At this point, it is up to the state’s executive branch to move as quickly as possible to launch the market, but the committee can’t force its hand with a deadline, Katz and Pierce said.

Discussions with the administration of Gov. Paul LePage have been minimal, Katz said. LePage campaigned against legalization last fall, and has said he would like to see it repealed. Katz and Pierce would like LePage to follow in the footsteps of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper. He didn’t want legalization, but once voters adopted it, he worked to implement it as smoothly as possible.

They urged LePage to appoint a marijuana coordinator to his cabinet, like Hickenlooper did in Colorado, but they haven’t gotten a response to their suggestions. As lawmakers, they can’t force the regulatory agencies to begin sales until rules are in place, and there is no mechanism for speeding up the process in a responsible manner, they said.

A LePage spokesman did not respond to a request for comment Tuesday.

Feds Can’t Interfere: Appropriations Committee Approves Amendment Again, Adds Two More States

July 27, 2017 by David Hodes 1 Comment
In a move closely watched by the cannabis industry, an amendment by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT), vice chairman of the Appropriations Committee, was approved Thursday, giving another year of protection from federal interference to medical marijuana businesses in states where it has been legalized.
The amendment, the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment (see link here) amends the Commerce, Justice, Science (CJS) and Related Agencies Appropriations bill to prohibit the use of federal funds to prevent the implementation of states’ medical cannabis laws.
It passed overwhelmingly by voice vote.

fmuThe amendment has been included in each annual budget bill since 2014. Similar language has been carried in enacted CJS Appropriations Acts since FY15, when the House added it in a floor amendment and kept it in conference.
The only change to the Leahy amendment’s language from last year is that it includes new states (Indiana and North Dakota).
In a statement released Thursday afternoon, Leahy reminded cannabis business owners and operators that “the amendment does not prevent federal law enforcement from pursuing individuals or dispensaries that are not in compliance with state laws,” and that “without this provision, Attorney General Sessions has signaled he may target medical marijuana patients and providers for violating federal drug laws.”
The amendment does not prevent federal law enforcement from pursuing individuals or dispensaries that are not in compliance with state laws.
Industry advocates were quick to respond to the good news.
National Cannabis Industry Association (NCIA) executive director Aaron Smith wrote in a statement that it was great to see members of the appropriations committee stand up for medical cannabis patients, and “the responsible businesses that serve them, and the states that have worked hard to create safe, regulated programs. Now it’s time for the House to do the same. Patients deserve access to care, states deserve respect, and members of the House deserve the opportunity to vote on amendments like this that have the strong support of their constituents.”
Whether or not the House of Representatives will take a vote on the amendment is unclear. They did not include its language in the version of the 2018 CJS bill that passed the House Appropriations Committee earlier this month. Last year, the amendment passed on the floor of the House by a vote of 242-186. If the CJS budget is approved in the Senate, the amendment will go to a special conference committee to reach a compromise with the House. If no budget is approved by September 30, the previous amendment will be automatically renewed for another year.
In a blog on the website for the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), Justin Strekal, the political director at NORML, wrote that the decision to reauthorize the Rohrabacher-Blumenauer amendment language by the Senate committee illustrates both compassion and common sense when it comes to marijuana policy. “Now, the majority of states and over 90 percent of the public approves of the use of marijuana as a medicine and Congress should not stand in the way of these reforms,” he wrote.
From the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP), Don Murphy, a former member of the Maryland General Assembly and MPP’s director of conservative outreach, issued this statement: “More than half the states have taken a stand and said they want their seriously ill residents to have safe and reliable access to medical marijuana, and today the Senate Appropriations Committee listened. What was expected to be a very successful vote passed on an overwhelming voice vote, while opposition to the Leahy amendment was literally a whimper. That sound we heard in the Senate was the sound of a waving white flag as the federal war on medical marijuana patients and providers winds down.”
A Quinnipiac University National Poll in April found that American voters say 60 – 34 percent “that the use of marijuana should be made legal in the U.S.,” the highest level of support for legalized marijuana in a Quinnipiac University national poll. Republicans and voters over 65 years old are the only listed party, gender, education, age or racial groups to oppose legalized marijuana.
Voters also support 94 – 5 percent “allowing adults to legally use marijuana for medical purposes if their doctor prescribes it,” also the highest level of support in any national poll by the the university.
Voters oppose 73 – 21 percent government enforcement of federal laws against marijuana in states that have legalized medical or recreational marijuana. No group supports enforcement in states where marijuana is legal.

In Memory Of R Cullen Stuart

We are sad to announce the tragic passing of our dear friend and long time Advisory Board member Cullen Stuart. He was a long time activist and supporter of the cannabis movement. As an elder in the community he helped educate not only our legislature and community at large, he helped educate the new generation of hemp farmers. Our support and prayers go to his family. He will be fondly remembered and greatly missed!

Robert “Cullen” Stuart moved to Maine from Chariton, Iowa in the early 1980's. Always eager to learn, he graduated from the University of Maine at Orono with a degree in Soil and Water Science. He worked for many years in the Lincoln Pulp and Paper Mill in the Environmental Dept., helping ensure that the mill stayed in compliance with environmental laws. Ever the fighter for truth and justice, he was a life long advocate for the hemp plant and it's many uses. In a time not so long ago, when it was not popular, if not risky, to speak out against cannabis prohibition, he never let prohibitionists malign “The Herb Superb”. His Hemp Education Booth was a strong presence at the Maine Organic Farmer and Gardner's Association Common Ground Fair for over 30 years. Throughout his life, he was an important voice of unbounded hemp enthusiasm, educating crowds of children and adults alike on the many benefits of the hemp plant to society. His love for the hemp plant was only exceeded by his love of his wife, Sarah. Cullen was a kind, generous person, always there to help before he was asked or before others even knew there was a need. He was loved by many and will be sorely missed. And don't get me started on his dissection of the so called War on Drugs...

Steve Ruhl

st4

370st2st3

Effective Testimonies

Effective testimonies

**Alert to MaineCaregivers** Public Hearing!

Wednesday, June 14th,2017

Proposed New Rules for Medical Marijuana in Maine 9:00am – Noon
Augusta Civic Center, 76 Community Drive, Augusta, ME

PLEASE..... PLEASE...... PLEASE....... BE THERE!

Or EMAIL COMMENTS TO:
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">
or submit online at CDC website

http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/mecdc/rules/rulemaking_comments.shtml?id=754500

Public Comment deadline 5:oopm, 6/26/17

See MMCM's LIVE Review and Q&A Session on the proposed new rules for medical marijuana in Maine

COME JOIN US …………. Review and Q & A Session

Proposed New Rules for Medical Marijuana in Maine

MMCM will be having a forum on Monday, June 12th, 6:00pm – 8:00pm
at the Homegrown Healthcare Alternative Wellness , Apothecary & Learning Center located at : 662 Stanley Road, Winthrop, ME 04364

Speakers will include:
Matt Dubois, Dubois Law, http://duboislawmaine.com
Chris McCabe, McCabe Law, LLC, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Logan Perkins, Silverstein Law, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

This will happen two days Prior to the Public Hearing on JUNE 14th, 2017
9:00am – Noon
Augusta Civic Center
76 Community Drive, Augusta, ME

Link to Proposed New Rules for Medical Marijuana in Maine
http://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/attach.php?id=754500&an=1

We all need to be there... or at least a written testimony! Deadline for public Comment is 5pm 6/26/17

Email Comments to: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.: or submit online at CDC Website http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/mecdc/rules/rulemaking_comments.shtml?id=754500

Congress Ties Jeff Sessions' Hands on Medical Marijuana

poAt least for now, the DOJ is likely to be barred from going after pot growers, sellers and users in states where medical weed's legal.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions is the bogey man to many in the nation's burgeoning marijuana industry. Many pot entrepreneurs fear that the nation's top law enforcement officer – who once said "good people don't smoke pot" – will use the full force of the federal government to raid their businesses, even though the majority of U.S. voters support legal or recreational marijuana.
But this week, medicinal marijuana business owners and patients are breathing a sigh of relief: The compromise bill to fund the government through September includes an extension of a provision that keeps Sessions' hands tied by explicitly barring the Department of Justice from using its resources to go after marijuana growers, sellers and users in the more than two dozen states, plus D.C., that have legalized medical marijuana – though, inexplicably, North Dakota and Indiana were left out (possibly because of a clerical error).
"Sessions is a tremendous concern. On the other hand, I don't think the Trump administration is going to want to see him busting into states that have thoughtfully legalized marijuana and the larger number of states that have legalized medical marijuana," Democratic Rep. Peter DeFazio of Oregon tells Rolling Stone. "I think it would cost Trump dearly amongst his support group if Sessions were to carry out that mission."


Read more here: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/congress-ties-jeff-sessions-hands-on-medical-marijuana-w480509

Interesting News!

With recreational marijuana sales on horizon, Maine's MMJ program surges

The medical marijuana program in Maine is red-hot, with the number of MMJ patients swelling in the past year. But the reason for the program's success appears to be quite different than for other states' growing MMJ industries - and it could have an impact on the state's new adult-use industry. For more details, check out our exclusive Chart of the Week: https://mjbizdaily.com/?p=66911
Marijuana Business Daily | A Division of Anne Holland Ventures Inc.

What a Great Idea…for our Caregivers!

A letter sent in by one of MMCM’s dedicated members at work.....

“Catherine you are a gem! A diplomatic, sane and logical voice for the MMJ program. Listening to you last night at MMCM monthly networking meeting and, this morning on *WVOM gave me the push to start a letter campaign with my patients to their respective local representatives. Free medicine for a copy of their letter to the proper representatives. Thank You! Its' not impossible to achieve our goals, just a lot of hard work. My crew and I are rolling our sleeves up! Time to work”

*Listen to Catherine Lewis, President of MMCM, on WVOM radio this morning...responding to Governor LePages’s Comments on Medical Marijuana...... click here

We need your Support! Come on Folks ….. Save our Medical Program

Next week on Tuesday April 4th at 1PM, there will be a Public Hearing on LD 1064 "An Act To Require That Health Insurance Policies Cover Medical Marijuana".

The Hearing will take place in Cross Bldg. Rm # 220. You can come and submit 2-3 minutes of verbal testimony to the Committee or Submit written testimony. Instead of printing of 20 copies, we would advise you to print off your own, and submit a digital copy to the clerk via email (toner is Pricey).

Submit your testimony to the Committee Clerk, Veronica Snow. Her email is This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The Audio Link for the Committee is provided here, so feel free to listen in!
Audio Link: Audio Link: http://legislature.maine.gov/Audio/#220

Also, Same Day same time.....
There will be a Work Session on LD 243 “An Act To Change the oversight Agency for Recreational Marijuana from the Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry to the Department of Administrative and Financial Services, Bureau of Alcoholic Beverages and Lottery Operations and to Allocate Funds for Implementation”
The Hearing will take place in Cross Bldg Rm #216.

Submit your testimony to the Committee Clerk, Steven Langlin. His email is
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

We need to stick together… as communities joining across Maine!

Everyone has seen Municipalities take an aggressive stance in the wake of the Adult Use vote in November. Some have enacted land use Ordinances and Zoning, while others have outright Banned (Newport). Many Municipalities have also not bothered to distinguish between Medical providers from Adult Use providers.
Another consideration on the table will be LD 672 "An Act To Clarify a Municipality's Authority To Adopt and Enforce Land Use Regulations for Marijuana Facilities"
We would like to ask help from the general public to Confront this and be present to advise Municipalities so that we do not suffer an unintentionally altered Medical access issue taken on at the Local level.
ACTION: We would like to ask members of the general public, patients and other concerned citizens to reach out, by either calling or emailing our office. Let us know if you know of municipalities which are enacting these local rules. Information you provide us with... can help protect Maine’s Patients and Caregivers from costly legislative errors made at the local level. We will need all members of our communities to engage, to help educate our local selectmen and town representatives on how we can improve situations that towns face across Maine. MMCM would like to track these municipalities so that we can help to organize community outreach and engagement with these municipalities. This will be a complex task and we need YOUR help!!
MMCM Office Phone: (207) 596-3501
MMCM Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
MMCM Municipality Tracking Facebook Page:
https://www.facebook.com/.../2599821844559.../admin_activities

Another note, on the Federal side....

HR 975 Respect State Marijuana Laws Act of 2017

This bill amends the Controlled Substances Act to provide that the Act's regulatory controls and administrative, civil and criminal penalties do not apply to a person who produces, possesses, distributes, dispenses, administers, or delivers marijuana in compliance with state laws.

Lets encourage folks to call or email their congress and senate Representatives in Washington DC; that would be Polliquin, Pingree, Collins, and King. Ask them to vote for and co-sponsor HR975, Respect Marijuana Laws Act of 2017 in the 115th Congress. Request a written response....

LETS KEEP ON WRITING THOSE TESTIMONIES!

The Joint Select Committee on Marijuana Legalization Implementation is hosting another Public Meeting at 9 a.m. Friday, March 17th, in Cross Building 216, Augusta, Maine.

"An act to change the oversight Agency for Recreational Marijuana from the Dept of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry to the Department of Administration and Financial Services, Bureau of Alcoholic Beverages and Lottery Operations and to allocate Funds for Implementation"

Again, please copy MMCM when you send your testimony to:

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.  (Committee Clerk)

Those who cannot attend the meeting are welcome to send emails of any written testimony. Those who do come bring 25 copies

Another Reason to write to your Representatives...

Increased banking regulations and risks... cause additional financial costs to Cannabis related Businesses...

February 17, 2017

Dear Business: Account holder,
Thank you for your membership at cPort. We value your business, and we want to inform you of an upcoming change to your cannabis-related business account.

As you are aware, as long as cannabis remains illegal under federal law, each cannabis-related business account at cPort represents heightened compliance risks, entailing specific account opening procedures, enhanced monitoring, and filings compared to our standard business accounts.

As the number of our cannabis-related business accounts has grown so, too, have these compliance risks and our time spent on these accounts. Commencing April 1, 2017, we are therefore instituting a monthly $35 fee, together with a 0.1 % cash transaction fee, reflecting the investment required by cPort to service these accounts.

Please find enclosed our cannabis-related business account fee schedule.

17.01.20 MMCM Annual Meeting at Senator Inn in Augusta

amm2017

The annual meeting of the Medical Marijuana Caregivers of Maine was held at the Senator Inn in Augusta on January 20, 2017.
Katie Digget sang and played before Chair Catherine Lewis and Treasurer Darrell Gudroe gave their reports to start the meeting.
Legislative Committee Chair Maureen McKerns spoke about the past year's legislative session and the goals for the upcoming session.
Chris VanDyke of C-Port Credit Union talked about C-Port's role in offering accounts to growers and caregivers.
Representative Deb Sanderson and Senator Eric Brakey encouraged patients and caregivers to get involved in the legislature.
Dr. Dustin Sulak of Integr8 presented an excellent talk on medical cannabis dosing levels.
Maine medical marijuana patients, Rick (father) and Austin (son), spoke about their brain injuries and the power of medical cannabis.
Bridget Kirouac, a Maine medical marijuana patient living in Florida, spoke about her arrest for growing in Florida and how Dr. Dustin Sulak testified at her trial and won her an acquittal.
Dan Thayer, President and co-founder of Thayer Corporation and LifeSpring, spoke about the future challenges facing growers and caregivers in regard to building and zoning ordinances.
Canna Cares Doc CEO Kevin Kafka ended the evening with a review of the national status of medical marijuana.
For information about the Medical Marijuana Caregivers of Maine, go to mmcm-online.org

Canna Care Docs offering new Services/New Prices

Maine Legislature Media Streaming - Listen LIVE or Archive

***LD 88, HP 66, 128th Legislature Public Hearing is being heard Today!!!!

Legislative updates Click Here

An Act To Delay the Implementation of Certain Portions of the Marijuana Legalization Act

This is your chance to give testimony...if you cannot make it today, please do a written testimony and Email to your Representative, send to : This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
*Please stress the importance of preserving the Medical Program during implementation of Adult Use

Legislative Update January 18, 2017

The work of the 128th session of the Maine Legislature has begun. There may be as many as 70 marijuana bills working their way through the system but this number is not unusually large. There were 83 bills sponsored in the 127th Legislative Session.
The titles of the sponsored bills for this session have been released but not the content. These titles provide clues and topics include: Edibles, OUI, Testing, Repeal, Regulate.
Leading the others on information release and scheduling are two sponsored bills.

LD 88, HP 66,128th Legislature An Act To Delay the Implementation of Certain Portions of the Marijuana Legalization Act

HP 96,128th Legislature Joint Order, Establishing the Joint Select Committee on Marijuana Legalization Implementation

The Maine Legislature provides a bill tracking & text search tool for all proposed legislation. Choose session 128th and type “marijuana” in the text search. The full content, sponsors and status information can be viewed http://legislature.maine.gov/bills/default_ps.asp?snum=128&PID=0

MMCM has submitted a comprehensive bill to expand the medical marijuana program and to regulate that expansion. An Act to Amend Maine’s Medical Marijuana Law. The bill is sponsored by Rep. Deb Sanderson and Senator Eric Brakey. The bill is at the Revisor’s Office awaiting production into final form. The Revisor's Office is the Legislature's central production office where all legislative instruments, including bills and amendments, are initially filed and then produced in final form for introduction. The final form of the bill will be available when it has completed the Revisor’s process.

Interesting Reads in Arizona....COURT RULES MEDICAL MARIJUANA USERS CANNOT BE CHARGED WITH DUI

Read the full article HERE

In 2017, cannabis is now more legal and accessible than ever. And its growing use is presenting new problems for law enforcement. Chief among those issues is how to handle folks who chief and drive. This issue is this: there is no reliable way to test how cannabis use influences driving. And in fact, several studies show that marijuana use does not impact driving ability very much. In light of this, an Arizona court ruled last week that legal medical cannabis patients can fight their DUI charges.

arizonas medical cannabis

Following Arizona’s Court of Appeals ruling, the burden of proof for charging cannabis users with a DUI is now on the police, not patients. Medical marijuana patients charged with a DUI can fight it in court. Importantly, this means that it’s now up to the arresting officer to prove that the THC impaired the driver.

And police are going to have a hard time doing so, because of two factors. Firstly, how impaired a driver is, has little to do with the amount of THC in their bloodstream. And secondly, people respond to THC very differently. So there’s no concrete basis for setting a legal limit on THC, unlike alcohol. What gets one person too high to drive might not affect another person very much.

arizonas medical cannabis2

Even the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration admits that it’s impossible to tell intoxication based on THC levels. Their website states that it is “difficult to establish a relationship” between THC in the blood and impairment.

It also says that it is “inadvisable” and “impossible” to predict any specific impacts based on THC concentration. Put simply, just because you have cannabis in your system doesn’t mean your driving will suck.

Taking all of this evidence into account, Arizona‘s medical cannabis patients are now legally entitled to fight the DUI charges. According to the court opinion from Judge Diane M. Johnsen, Arizona law doesn’t set a legal level for THC intoxication.

And the mere presence of THC in a driver’s system doesn’t make them intoxicated by default. Therefore, the court concluded, it is fair to hear challenges from medical cannabis patients who believe police unfairly gave them a DUI.

So how does someone challenge a DUI under the new ruling? All they have to do is present evidence that they were not impaired while driving. The accused individual can do this by cross-examining the arresting officer. Drivers accused of DUIs for cannabis use can also hear testimony from forensic experts provided by the state.

All of this dates back to a 2013 arrest of Nadir Ishak. Ishak is a medical cannabis patient who was charged with a DUI after police pulled him over and noticed his bloodshot and glassy eyes. A judge later convicted Ishak for driving with marijuana in his system.

However, during his day in court, Ishak was prevented from presenting evidence that he was a registered, legal medical marijuana patient. Ishak’s case has since been thrown out. Thanks to the new ruling, other patients charged with DUI will be able to fight the charges against them.

REMINDER… AS A (Cannabis) BUSINESS OWNER…END OF YEAR…SALES TAX!

This is intended as advice to assist folks in complying with their obligations under Maine Tax Law.
Medical Marijuana dispensaries and Primary Caregivers registered with the Maine Department of Health and Human Services are retailers...and are required to register as retailers with MRS and remitting Maine Sales Tax.

For more information GO TO link... http://www.maine.gov/revenue/salesuse/Bull602016_08_01.pdf

Or Contact Judy A. Methot
Deputy Director, Sales, Fuel and Special Tax Division
Maine Revenue Services - http://maine.gov/revenue
207.699.6473 This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Industrial Hemp Now Accepting Applications to Grow Industrial Hemp in 2017

The Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry is currently accepting applications to grow industrial hemp for the 2017 growing season. Applications can be obtained on the Industrial Hemp Website. Applications must be received by April 1.

Despite the recent referendum that legalized recreational marijuana, the licensing and THC testing requirements for growing industrial hemp remain unchanged.

Questions? Contact Gary Fish at 207-287-7545 or email This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

Explanation of Industrial Hemp Licensing Fees

Maine law requires that the Department cover the costs of operating the industrial hemp program by charging an application fee, license fee and a per acre fee. These fees are as follows:

$100 application fee – this fee must be submitted with the application.
$500 license fee – this fee is due after approval of the application and must be submitted with the signed licensing agreement.
$50/acre fee – this fee is due after approval of the application and must be submitted with the signed licensing agreement.

Fees collected will cover Departmental costs including, but not limited to:

 - Inspector travel costs including time to and from the growing area to take crop samples for THC content analysis;
 - Costs of transporting crop samples to a lab for THC content analysis;
 - Laboratory fees for testing crop samples;
 - Costs of equipment and supplies used in sampling;
 - Departmental time reviewing applications, preparing licensing agreements and issuing licenses;
 - Other administrative costs

Please note that the fees charged will only cover THC testing for one composite sample taken to represent the entire licensed crop. Licensees that wish to have individual growing areas or varieties tested separately will be responsible for paying any additional laboratory costs.

Guidance on Submitting Proof of a Certified Seed Source

Maine law requires that industrial hemp be planted using a certified seed source. The industrial hemp rule (Chapter 274) defines a certified seed source as one that is certified according to AOSCA (Association of Seed Certifying Agencies) or other approved standards and comes from plants that were tested during the active growing season and found to produce industrial hemp with 0.3% THC content or less. The Department understands the very limited availability of industrial hemp seed and the certified seed source requirements are difficult or nearly impossible to meet. While the Department is required to verify and collect documents which indicate the industrial hemp seed planted comes from a certified seed source, at least for 2017, we can be somewhat flexible on the form this certification may take. Acceptable forms of certification could include a letter, form or other written verification or combination of these documents that at a minimum includes:

Third party (someone other than the applicant and the grower of the seed) THC content lab test results for the industrial hemp. The third party should be identified on the testing results;
THC content test results must be for the variety or varieties included on the application and preferably for the specific lot of seed to be planted;
Results of THC content testing and the date tests were conducted;
The name of the seed supplier and origin of the seed.

As industrial hemp seed certified by AOSCA, or other official seed certification programs becomes more available, the Department will review and revise our policies and issue stricter guidelines for acceptable documentation of seed certification.

Read the full article from here

Agricultural Trades Show - Pesticide Applicator Training Programs- Augusta Civic Center January 10-12, 2017

Download the brochure from HERE

Maine Board of Pesticides Control

Agricultural Trades Show- Pesticide Applicator Training Programs

Augusta Civic Center January 10-12, 2017

Pesticide Applicator Exam Training for Growers Tuesday, January 10, 2017

Maine Board of Pesticides Control

Fort Western Room (no credits) Pre-registration Is required*

BPC will present a three-hour training session to prepare growers for the P1ivate Pesticide Applicator Core exam. In the afternoon, Core and commodity exams will be administered only to those who attended the training.
Space is limited.*
10:15-1:15 Training
2:15-4:00 Exams

*Pre-registration required. Please go to www.thinkfirstspraylast.org  to reserve a seat

The Maine Board of Pesticides Control has a new information technology system. Licenses and notices are now being sent via email instead of through the postal service whenever possible, which means you will receive them much faster if we have your email. Please send your email address to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Coming soon!
A self-service website which will allow users to:
• Sign up for exams
• Submit applications for licensing
• Keep track of recertification credits
• Reprint licenses-free!
• Renew licenses
• Pay for exams and licenses

Attention to those with concerns about Question 1~

With the extremely close margin of under 3000 votes and votes still being counted, we want the public to understand adult use has not been signed in yet. We anticipate a call for a recount and then the governor must still sign it into law. It will take at least 9 months for the State to implement the program and create rules.

The medical program continues to care for the patients of Maine as usual. You must possess a valid medical cannabis recommendation to possess and use. Nothing has changed. Caregivers and dispensaries may only provide medical cannabis to card holding patients. Please be patient as the details are made known.

MMCM will be conducting business as usual. The office is moving to a new location this next week and will reopen December 1st. Cheryl is still available by phone at 207-596-3501 or by email at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Thank you,
Catherine Lewis
Board President
Medical Marijuana Caregivers of Maine Trade Association
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

MMCM Statement for questions asked... regarding which way to vote. Vote NO!

MMCM's primary mission is to maintain and improve access to safe medicinal cannabis for the patients of Maine and we have been unable to spend our limited resources on this debate over the re-regulation of cannabis "like alcohol". However, with the increased attention from both social and traditional media, our phones have been ringing off the hook with members and others seeking guidance and information . For this reason we feel it is necessary to clarify the issues as we see them should this initiative pass at this time.

Although there is language in the referendum specifically protecting Maine's Medical Marijuana Program, there are many other details of the referendum that threaten it. Additionally, in other states, after a vote to "legalize" marijuana, the legislative and rule making process that follows has negatively impacted those states' medical programs severely. We are now hearing positions and attitudes that reflect those threats in conversations with representatives and government officials, and as well in news reports from the media. For these reasons we feel this referendum has a serious potential to adversely affect patient support and access to good quality medicinal cannabis and the caregiver model in Maine's Medical Marijuana Program.

We encourage our members and others to read both Dr Sulak's and Canna Care Docs' recent posts that provide good, detailed, and balanced reviews of the issues. We've also included links to the referendumas well so you can see for yourself how these issues arise from the language.

MMCM will continue to focus our attention on protecting and improving patient and caregiver rights under Maine's Medical Marijuana Program, but felt that with so much happening it was important to provide some guidance to those who having been looking to us for it.

Revised Statue Updates for Maine Medical use of Marijuana Act

Maine Medical Use of Marijuana Program - Sales Tax letter for Caregivers

Information Regarding Electrical Wiring of Medical Marijuana Facilities

Download the document from HERE

This document is in response to the many questions and concerns received by the State Electrical Inspectors concerning the wiring of medical marijuana facilities (grow facilities). This is not a “how to” document. This document is meant to inform the public, medical marijuana growers and licensees of the Electricians’ Examining Board (licensed electricians) about State laws and rules pertaining to grow facilities. These laws and rules apply to all business/commercial entities including grow facilities. There are no new laws or interpretations here.

Any person growing for him/herself may only wire a grow facility in that person’s own single family dwelling provided the person owns and occupies that single family dwelling and it is used solely as a single family dwelling. That person may or may not be required to obtain an electrical permit from a local municipality. Owners of grow facilities should check with the town or city to see whether an electrical permit is required. Please be responsible! There is a lot of electricity involved even in a small grow facility. The potential for fire and/or electrocution is definitely present if the wiring is not done correctly. If you have no wiring experience, please hire a licensed master or limited to house wiring electrician to wire a personal medical marijuana facility in your home.

Any marijuana caregiver grow facility, regardless of where it is located, requires an electrical permit for that electrical installation from a town, city or the state, whichever entity has jurisdiction. Even in a single family home or an accessory building associated with a single family home, a caregiver facility must be wired by a licensed master electrician and a permit must be obtained. Again, this is not a new requirement. A barbershop or beauty shop in a single family home has historically required a permit. In anticipation of questions on this point, the applicable laws are listed below.

· State law that requires all wiring be done by an electrician (32 M.R.S. § 1201).
· Single family dwelling may be wired by a homeowner under certain conditions (32 M.R.S. §
1105).
· Permits are required (32 M.R.S. § 1102-B) for electrical installations with certain exceptions (32
M.R.S. § 1102-B(5)). A medical marijuana grow facility is not a manufacturing facility.
· The National Electrical Code defines a one family dwelling as: “A building that consists solely
of one dwelling unit.” NFPA 70 Article 100.

Can a Maine medical marijuana patient or caregiver buy or own a gun?

Matt Dubois - Read the article here: http://www.duboislawmaine.com/single-post/2016/06/03/FAQ-Friday-Can-a-Maine-medical-marijuana-patient-or-caregiver-buy-or-own-a-gun

One of the questions I run into most frequently in my practice is, "Can a patient or caregiver legally buy or own a gun in Maine?" The short answer is 'no,' under federal law, and even under Maine law, being a patient or caregiver creates additional legal risk for gun owners. This post will address some of the laws affecting medical marijuana patients, caregivers, and gun owners at both the federal and state levels.

gunFederal Law

Q: Is a medical marijuana user permitted to buy a gun from a licensed dealer under federal law?

A: No. Under the federal Gun Control Act of 1968, it is illegal for any person to sell a firearm to a person who is "an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance." Because the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) treats anyone who uses marijuana as an "unlawful user" (since cannabis is a Schedule I drug under the CSA), it is federally prohibited to sell a firearm to anyone who uses cannabis.

A firearms dealer is required to ask each prospective buyer, on the background check form, if the buyer is a user of illegal drugs. Because a medical marijuana patient is considered an "illegal" drug user under the CSA, a patient who uses medical marijuana must answer "yes" to that question, or commit perjury. If a patient were to answer untruthfully and later faced federal charges, it could come to light that the patient bought the gun illegally and falsified the background check. This would likely carry additional fines and add to a potential prison sentence.

Q: Is a medical marijuana user permitted to possess a gun or ammo under federal law?

A: No. It is prohibited, under the federal Gun Control Act of 1968, for anyone who is "an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance" to even possess any "firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce." Since virtually all firearms and ammunition have been shipped or transported interstate (this includes the parts they're made from), it is prohibited under federal law for a cannabis user to even possess a gun or ammo.

It is true that virtually everything a medical marijuana patient or caregiver does with cannabis is prohibited at the federal level, and that it is currently a U.S. Department of Justice policy not to prosecute people who lawfully participate in state medical marijuana programs. However, this policy could potentially change at any time. Thus, any patient or caregiver who owns a firearm is at risk of federal prosecution.

Maine Law

Q: Are there any additional prohibitions under Maine law against a cannabis user buying a gun from a licensed dealer?

A: No, Maine law does not provide any additional prohibitions or penalties for firearm sales to cannabis users above and beyond those provided under federal law.

Q: Are there any additional prohibitions under Maine law against a medical marijuana user or caregiver possessing a gun or ammo?

A: No, however, that isn't the end of the story. While Maine law does not prohibit a person from possessing or owning a gun simply because that person uses medical marijuana, being a patient or caregiver does pose additional risks to Maine gun owners. In the event that a patient or caregiver were charged with a Maine drug offense, prosecutors could allege involvement of a gun in the offense to enhance the charges. For instance, if the state decided a firearm was sufficiently related to a caregiver's drug trafficking charge, the charge could be enhanced to "aggravated trafficking," with increased potential jail time and fines.

Conclusion

In short, for a law-abiding Maine medical marijuana patient or caregiver to own a firearm does expose him or her to increased risk of fines and incarceration at both the federal and state levels. Many understandably feel that the federal prohibition against medical marijuana users owning firearms is a violation of patients' Second Amendment rights. However, until the law changes, patients and caregivers should be aware of the serious legal risks posed by gun ownership.

For more information on the legal landscape of medical marijuana and gun ownership, contact Dubois Law.

MEDICAL CANNABIS ADVOCATES

As a medical cannabis advocate, you should be aware that the Rohrabacher-Farr amendment to the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) budget has been helping defendants win in federal court. Beginning with the Marin Alliance for Medical Marijuana ruling last October, to dropping the case against Harborside this May, to the McIntosh victory in the 9th Circuit last month, the amendment has been protecting safe and legal access for patients. The amendment was passed in 2014 and 2015 thanks in part to the support and efforts of medical cannabis activists like you!

Earlier this year, the Senate Appropriations Committee voted overwhelming to include it in next DOJ budget. However, the amendment is set to expire at the end of September and the House has yet to vote on it. If the amendment expires, the federal prosecutions against those obeying their state medical cannabis laws could resume once again.

You can help by sending an email to your representative thanking them for voting yes last year or to encourage those who voted no to take another look at the issue.

WE NEED YOUR HELP, PLEASE PAY ATTENTION!!!!

Many towns are drafting zoning ordinances and moratoriums for medical marijuana businesses. It is crucial that we stay on top of what is happening in our towns. As we attend town meetings we have discovered there is a lot of mis information being shared. This is an opportunity for us to educate our communities. We encourage members to read local papers and to please contact MMCM immediately if a meeting to discuss zoning has been scheduled or added to the agenda. It is important for MMCM to attend as well as members of that community. Some towns are trying to prohibit where patients and caregivers can grow, process and consume cannabis. We are working hard to ensure the rules make sense and patients and caregivers rights are protected.

Free Disposal of Banned, Unusable Pesticides Available to Maine Residents

Maine Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry sent this bulletin at 08/24/2016 10:05 AM EDT

Saco considers medical marijuana rules

Medical marijuana caregivers face restrictions in Saco, Maine

By Gillian Graham Staff Writer / Portland Press Herald
Read the article here: http://www.pressherald.com/2016/08/01/medical-marijuana-caregivers-face-restrictions-in-saco/

Councilors are considering the state's first ban on in-home growing of pot by caregivers, but it may violate state law and would be hard to enforce.

Saco could become the first community in Maine to ban small in-home medical marijuana growers.

City officials are considering zoning ordinance amendments that would prohibit medical marijuana caregivers from cultivating marijuana in their homes and limit them to the city’s industrial business district. But a medical marijuana caregivers trade group says the proposal is overly restrictive and may conflict with state law.
Both city officials and medical marijuana advocates believe Saco is the first community to consider prohibiting caregivers from growing medical marijuana in their homes, although a slew of towns – including neighboring Biddeford – have considered zoning restrictions as more caregivers cultivate in commercial spaces.

Saco City Administrator Kevin Sutherland said the City Council enacted a moratorium on medical marijuana facilities to allow officials time to determine where in the city such businesses should be allowed. As officials reviewed zoning, they recognized “it would be important to make this new use a prohibited use under home occupations” because of public safety concerns. He said concerns include the amount of electricity used for cultivation and the difficulty some medical marijuana businesses have accessing banking because marijuana is illegal under federal law.

“A lot of these caregivers may have a lot of money on hand. I’d rather it be in a locked facility than someone’s dresser drawer,” Sutherland said. “We don’t have enough police officers to patrol every house that might be participating in this.”

The Saco City Council will hold a workshop on the proposal Monday night, and the Planning Board will host a public hearing Tuesday night.

STATE HAS ABOUT 2,800 CAREGIVERS

Across the river in Biddeford, city officials also enacted a moratorium on medical marijuana caregivers in commercial spaces and are developing zoning regulations. The city’s Planning Board will hold a public hearing Wednesday on proposed amendments that would require a conditional use permit for commercial caregiver facilities and require a setback of 250 feet from schools, playgrounds and churches. City Manager Jim Bennett said the City Council has indicated it does not support regulating individual growers in their homes.

Sanford and Waterville are among the other communities that recently have adopted zoning amendments that require caregivers in commercial spaces to be located in certain parts of the city.

There are roughly 2,800 caregivers in Maine, with about 2,500 of those growing for patients other than a family member, according to Medical Marijuana Caregivers of Maine.

The state cannot provide an exact number of patients because it does not keep a registry, but doctors have printed more than 35,000 certificates required under state regulations to certify patients. That number could include duplicates and replacement certificates and is likely higher than the actual number of patients, according to DHHS.

The state requires caregivers to grow their plants in secure enclosures away from public view and prohibits them from allowing patients into their cultivation areas. The state also prohibits caregivers from forming collectives where they grow plants together.

Catherine Lewis, board president of Medical Marijuana Caregivers of Maine, said most caregivers are small “mom and pop” businesses that consist of a garden at home. Caregivers typically meet with patients at the patient’s home, she said.

Lewis said she understands why municipalities want to set up zoning for caregivers operating in commercial facilities, but questions whether Saco’s proposal goes too far.

“It seems like an overreaction or knee-jerk reaction to fear of the unknown,” Lewis said. “(Caregivers) have a garden within their home or outside. Basically, Saco is saying they can’t grow tomatoes in their backyard.”

A provision of the state medical marijuana law says municipalities are not prohibited from limiting the number and location of registered dispensaries, but that “a local government may not adopt an ordinance that is duplicative of or more restrictive than the provisions of this act.” That language was added to the law in 2011 to protect the privilege of caregivers and patients to cultivate at home, said Paul McCarrier, a longtime caregiver and medical marijuana industry consultant. He does not believe Saco’s prohibition on caregivers growing in their homes would stand up in court.

“Medical marijuana cultivation is complicated and I can understand the concerns of code enforcement. It’s natural that Saco would want to be out front and get citizen feedback,” McCarrier said. “This should not be used to shutter any current home-occupation caregivers who are helping sick patients, and I hope the city administration is sensitive to that.”

Lewis said representatives from the trade group likely will attend the Saco meetings and would like to work more closely with municipalities considering zoning changes.

She said she hopes municipalities will “not be so reactionary.”

UNABLE TO ‘ZONE OUT’ CAREGIVERS

Sutherland, the Saco city administrator, said city officials decided to pursue the moratorium and zoning amendments after the code enforcement officer was “inundated” with requests from caregivers who want to open growing facilities. The code enforcement officer needed guidance on where they could locate within the city, he said.

The city had not previously addressed the issue because of a 2012 legal opinion “that said we couldn’t do anything about it,” Sutherland said. But a more recent legal opinion says the city cannot zone caregivers out, but can regulate where they go and develop standards for the buildings in which they are housed.

Eric Conrad, spokesman for the Maine Municipal Association, said the organization hears “quite a bit” about the zoning issue from communities across the state.

“It is a common question that our member towns and cities face these days as society grapples with legalization of medical marijuana for medical purposes, and yet it is still illegal for many non-medical uses,” he said. The association makes sure that municipal officials understand the state’s laws, particularly regarding confidentiality provisions for caregivers and patients.

Enforcement of a ban on home-based growers would be difficult to enforce.

The DHHS keeps the names of caregivers private except in certain law enforcement-related situations, and there is no public listing of caregiver locations. City officials currently are aware of three caregivers in Saco – one each in a residential, business and industrial zone – but say there could be more.

DETAILS OF PROPOSED REGULATION

Sutherland said the city is aiming the ban at caregivers with multiple customers and is not trying to regulate patients who grow their own medical marijuana. “There’s no way we’d regulate that,” he said.

Caregivers already operating in Saco would be exempt from the new zoning requirements.

Under the proposal, medical marijuana caregiver facilities could not house more than three separate caregivers, must be located separately from the caregiver’s primary residence and must be locked and secured. Caregiver facilities would be located in the I-2 industrial business district, which also allows businesses such as hotels, banks, sports arenas and light industry. Sutherland said the I-2 zone was the best fit for caregivers because of the large amount of electricity used.

“What I struggle with is, while industrial (zoning) makes the most sense for the electrical capacity, they do take up space that could be used for businesses with more employees that don’t use as much electricity,” he said.

Saco’s proposal was developed with input from developers and caregivers, Sutherland said.

The City Council is expected to take an initial vote on the proposal Aug. 15, then hold a public hearing before a final vote in mid-September.

PESTICIDES CORE MANUAL AND EXAM

MMCM is trying to put together a schedule of classes and exam for caregivers to obtain their pesticide license... until then, please find below the information to be able to access and or download the Core Manual from the University.

Pesticide Education (core) Manual is available from the University of Maine Cooperative Extension at http://umaine.edu/ipm/pesticide-safety/certification-manual-prices/  or call 207-581-3880.

The exam can be taken at the BPC office in Augusta (207-287-2731)

If you already have your license...and are interested in obtaining any credit workshops...checkout a list of dates and times

pesticideclasses

The Maine Medical Use of Marijuana Program has a new address

The Maine Medical Use of Marijuana Program is now located at Maine CDC in the Key Bank Plaza, 286 Water Street. The phone numbers of program staff and the current mailing address remain unchanged.

Staff are available to those who wish to visit the office to ask questions or drop off information from 9 a.m. to noon on Tuesday,  Wednesdays and Thursday. Visitors must check in at the reception area.

For general program information, please call 287-3282 or 287-9330.

Seniors Make Up The Fastest-Growing Demographic of Marijuana Users

Between 2013-2014, people 55 years old and older had the largest increase in marijuana use, according to CBS This Morning. This demographic went from 2,812,000 to 4,309,000 marijuana users in that time frame, according to the segment. This shows that seniors are embracing marijuana at a rapid pace.

Let doctors treat addiction with medical marijuana

By Patricia Callahan
Read the article here: http://callahan.bangordailynews.com/2016/04/22/home/let-doctors-treat-addiction-with-medical-marijuana/#.VxtslJ-sTLs.facebook

I attended a hearing at the Maine Department of Health and Human Services on Tuesday and wanted to share some brief thoughts. I’ve been following the movement to allow prescribers to treat addiction to opiates and other drugs with medical marijuana. This hearing was in response to a petition put forth by Dawson Julia of Unity requesting that the department do so.

Because the hearing room was too small to allow all the attendees in at once, people had to come and go throughout the five hours allotted, and it was hard to gauge exactly how many people were there. I would say more than 50 but less than 100. DHHS staff did a great job escorting folks in and out of the room and allowed each speaker five minutes. The staff person coordinating the flow of attendees told me she had never had so many people come to a petition hearing in her experience.

At first, I spent some time outside talking among the dozens waiting to be let into the room, and I should have taken pics, but it was drizzly and cold, and my old lady fingers can’t work the little buttons on my mom’s little camera once they catch a chill so, sorry — no pics. One of the young men I met, though, appeared on Channel 8 News — click here to see him on video — named Matt Low. Low told me he’s been through a series of attempting to quit opiates, relapsing each time.

Like so many others who testified at the hearing, Low started with prescription medications. By the time he stopped using again a few months ago, he was using four grams of heroin/fentanyl a day. Low said he started his recovery cold turkey this time. After a few days of utter mental and physical desperation, he reached out to someone in the medical marijuana community who specialized in concentrated cannabis products.

In my interviews and in the testimony, people in recovery with cannabis have said concentrates — medical marijuana products with higher levels of the THC and/or CBD components of the plant — have been critical during the immediate withdrawal phase. These people have been able to access marijuana legally for conditions other than addiction and say it helped them come off opiates and other addictive medications.

Low said the caregiver with whom he works (and someone I’ve met writing this series) is providing more than just marijuana products. Low says Dennis Hammoc of Milo instills other recovery tenets in their time together, like purpose. Low says he feels purposeful for the first time in years, and, “For the first time, I feel hope. The other times I tried to quit I didn’t.”

I had too many great conversations to include here, but I did want to highlight a conversation I had with a home health-care professional who works with geriatric clients. Stacy Briggs, a former Coast Guard helicopter mechanic who became a CNA, is continuing her education/certification because she loves working with seniors. Briggs is concerned that seniors are being overlooked in the talk of addiction and other negative side effects from long-term opiate use, and spoke articulately about a couple cases where she thought the over-prescribing of opiates and sleep aids contributed to the deterioration of her clients’ health, behavior and basic safety.

One of those seniors, she said, decided to get certified to use medical marijuana products and was able to cut her use of pain medications by half within a few weeks and is continuing to decrease the amount of pain medications she is taking. Briggs said the client’s cognition and behavior improved almost immediately.

Once in the room, I was able to listen to about three hours of testimony. Some of the folks I’ve been interviewing attended the entire meeting and said only three people had testified against the petition prior to me getting there. I heard another three, including Scott Gagnon who rights the blog Smart Approaches to Public Health, and lawyer Gordon Smith, representing the Maine Medical Association.

As for those testifying against, I have two observations. First, they were all professionals. To the best of my knowledge, not one person in recovery from a substance use disorder testified against the petition.

I didn’t hear anyone stand up and say, “My name is so and so. I am in recovery from such and such, and I think this proposal is dangerous because...”

All the people I heard testifying in favor of the petition were actually in recovery from something or speaking on behalf of someone in recovery. Father after father testified about getting their children back or being better. Parents publicly acknowledging their failures when on opiates and other drugs.

There were also professionals working with people in recovery testifying in favor of the petition, including at least two Maine Medical Association physicians, as Smith observed when he testified in opposition, which brings me to my other observation. The three people I heard testifying against the petition kept bringing up the lack of science behind the proposal, implying it could be dangerous to rely on anecdotal evidence, rather than science.

This argument is problematic because there is some science, and there would be more science were it not for government restrictions. Further, where were all the calls for sound science when it came to the push to use opiates to treat chronic pain longterm — a big part of how we got into this addiction epidemic?

I heard person after person testify about starting their addictions with prescription pain medications.

If there was science behind that push, then that science made people sick. The makers of Oxycontin are paying the state of Kentucky $24 million for the fallout from its marketing practices, presumably based on science. It’s not hard to understand why some of the attendees weren’t feeling the love for the call for science — it did ring a little hollow.

As Smith dismissed their experiences as anecdotal and lacking in significance enough to warrant supporting the petition, he did at least acknowledge that the folks testifying were “sincere.” That he used that word bothered me.

The folks who testified that they had began their addictions following medication regimens prescribed by medical professionals were sincere in their testimony. They were also sincere when they first went to medical professionals to have their conditions treated and were sincere in doing what their doctors told them to do.

Unfortunately, their sincerity and their trust in the medical community led to substance use disorders. I wish Smith had talked about his association’s role in betraying that sincerity. Then I wish he had spoken to his association’s sincerity in trying to control how people clean up the mess members of his association had a hand in making. Without those two qualifying statements, what Smith did say just didn’t sound that sincere to me.

Page 1 of 2